IANE
INVENTORS' ASSOCIATION OF NEW ENGLAND
"EMPOWERING INVENTORS!"
NEWS
Edison with the phonograph, June 16, 1888
From time to time, NEWS & INFORMATION of particular
interest to IANE members will be found on this page. This is provided voluntarily
as a benefit of membership in IANE and is
merely presented as information only. Disclaimed are any claims as to accuracy
or 'goodness to fit' and of applicability in a particular case. Use
it at your own disgression and risk. Obtain legal advice and professional
help before venturing too far in patent matters. "Dont just sit there..INVENT!!"
Do
you need help with your invention? Are you looking for an expert?
Maybe the person was sitting next to you at the last IANE
Meeting, but you didn't know thier name or
what they do. Maybe their 'mug shot' will 'ring a bell'?? IANE
member Shirley Woo, (Shirwoo@yahoo.com),
Profile Master has volunteered to prepare Profiles of IANE
Members, "mug shots", their inventing help needs, expertise and
items of general interest. Our Member Profiles resources can
help you get 'unstuck'. A special web site link has been dedicated
to IANE MEMBERS
ONLY who may access this password protected site at IANE
MEMBERS ONLY WEB SITE .
.#####################################################################################
IANE
IS THE PROUD RECIPIENT OF THE 2003 UIA WEBSITE
EXCELLENCE AWARD!
"The UIA (United Inventor's Association) confers its EXCELLENCE AWARD
on non-profit inventor organization web sites that explain the process
of product development, provide extensive links to other web sites
and sources of information, and promote a positive image of inventors."
"It is my pleasure to inform you that your site has been selected
for the Fourth Annual UIA Website Excellence Award. This is our way of
recognizing your efforts to inform, educate and connect independent inventors.
Your efforts have not gone unnoticed. On behalf of independent inventors
everywhere, we thank you".
Keep up the good work,
Bob Lougher, Executive Director, UIA
IANE
is pleased to receive the coveted UIA
2003 Excellence Award for our web site
and thank Bob Lougher, the entire staff of UIA and the independent inventors
and visitors who have nominated us for the award. We have a dedicated
group of volunteer inventors who have helped make this web site what it
is. We will continue to serve you well by providing useful information
of interest to the invention community. Thanks. Joe
Birkner webmaster.
************************************************************************
United States Patent &
Trademark Office Issues 7 Millionth Patent
Patent Assigned to DuPont for
Novel Fibers
WASHINGTON, D.C.– The Department of Commerce’s United States Patent
and Trademark Office (USPTO) today February 14, 2006 issued patent No.
7 million to DuPont senior researcher John P. O’Brien for “polysaccharide
fibers” and a process for their production. The fibers have cotton-like
properties, are biodegradable and are useful in textile applications.
It took 75 years to get from patent No.1 to patent 1 million. It
has taken less than one tenth of that time to go from 6 million to 7 million
patents. And now just a little more than six years later, patent No. 7
million issues. Patent No. 1 was issued in 1836. Earlier patents were not
numbered, although the first U.S. patent was issued in 1790. Approximately
10,000 patents were issued between 1790 and 1836. The USPTO issued 151,079
utility patents in fiscal year 2005.
FREE ENERGY???
(If you belive this we will sell you the
Zakum Bridge!!)
Here's an interesting "Perpetual Motion-Type
Fun Machine" that you may get a chuckle from.
Inventor reads by light powered by electricity provided by the ceiling
transducer of a bouncing ball engine. He's wearing earplugs. A ball bounces
up and down between floor and ceiling, both rigid and massive. The bounces
are assumed elastic, that is the ball's velocity after impact is the same
as before impact, but with reversed direction.
Click on Link to View.
Perpetual
Motion Bouncing Ball Energy Generator
Please Note: Perpetual Motion Machines are NOT
patentable, although, reportedly, a few have passed scrutiny by various
patent offices, including foreign offices. An invention has to work
to be patented.
*****************************************************************************
USPTO Web Site For Independent
Inventors
The Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO)'s Web site specifically meets the special needs and interests of
independent inventors and entrepreneurs who comprise about 18% of filers
of patents with the USPTO. “How to” brochures, previously available
only in paper, are now posted on USPTO Web pages expressly designed for
independent inventors. Links to other useful USPTO Web pages, such as the
Patent and Trademark Depository Library Program and Patent Cooperation
Treaty, have been added, as have links to other government agencies, including
the Small Business Administration and the Federal Trade Commission, each
of which have programs and information useful to independent inventors.
USPTO’s independent inventor Web site now also has a useful “tip of the
month.”
The Inventor Assistance Program Web site is located at:
INVENTOR'S
ASSISTANCE
################################################################################################
SUPREME COURT PATENT DECISION
FAVORS INVENTORS in re. FESTO CORP.
vs. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. Ltd.No.00-1543. Argued January
8, 2002 -- Decided May 28, 2002
copyright 2002
By
Joseph R. Birkner, Registered Patent Agent
After a 13 year long battle, regarding, essentially what was considered
to be equivalent, the ruling in the case of Festo Corp. vs. Shoketsu Kinzoku
Kogyo Kabushiki Co. Ltd. partially restores an inventor's right to use
the "doctrine of equivalents," a concept that allows broad interpretation
of patents, to defend against infringement. This would only apply
if the inventor can prove that he or she could not have foreseen
the development of a competing technology. Without a crystal ball,
the inventor, with proof, may have a good chance at arguing this point
provided the inventor did not know about a company's developments.
This underscores the reason for having a good patent search professionally
conducted to possibly uncover the latest technology which may avoid such
issues.
On May 28, 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court returned
a level of protection to small inventors and to patent holders against
would-be copycats in a case that handed a partial victory, for now, to
FESTO CORP. But the ruling puts a new burden of proof on original
patent holders to continue to defend their claims as has always been the
case, now, however, it may be more favorable to do so, in view of the latest
decision. The details and legal ramifications of FESTO are quite
detailed and lots of discussion regarding its impact will be forthcoming.
Briefly, FESTO, a robotic products maker, involved earlier in 1988,
in a suit against SMC Corp. for patent infringement because SMC had
made a product that so closely mimicked its own that their parts were interchangeable
and indistinguishable. A decision in the Federal Circuit Court
of Appeals (CAFC), at that time, ruled in favor of SMC, because FESTO amended
their patent claims and which the CAFC said was no longer equivalent (to
SMC's invention). Now, after much soul searching and debate, the
Supreme Court vacated the CAFC decision, overturning it, which impacts
other cases including Kabushiki and thereby in re-affirming the so-called
doctrine of equivalents. The Supreme Court set new guidelines that the
amended claims must meet to receive doctrine of equivalent protection
and squashed the lower court's attempt to effectively rewrite patent
law. This is why it is very crucial that a patent practioner skilled
in current patent law matters prosecute an inventor's application.
It is not for the do-it-yourselfer. Had this decision not been overturned,
it would have not been as favorable for inventors, because in very simple
terms, for example, if an element such as a fastener in the patent
application for connecting two parts together is called a screw, a rivet
may not be equivalent under the CAFC, which is ridiculous. Fortunately,
the Supreme Court intervened in a manner beneficial to inventors, especially,
independent inventors. Had they not done so, would have, in my opinion,
been a grave misjustice, and would have ursurped the purpose of patent
protection by severely and unwisely limiting the scope of coverage which
would have poured ice water on creativity. I'd be happy to
discuss the ramifications of this ruling with IANE members.
DISNEY'S ART OF ANIMATION PATENTED ON
MAY 21, 1940
USPTO recognizes Walt Disney and his advancement
in animation Walter E. Disney, of Los Angeles, received patent #2,201,689
for the art of animation on May 21, 1940, the 62nd anniversary of his patent.
It was for a multi-plane camera that allowed for a more realistic three-dimensional
image as well as depth and richness to the animation. Disney's invention
enabled him to move from the standard animated short films he made famous,
such as "Steamboat Willie" featuring Mickey Mouse® (trademark registration
#0247156) in 1928, to the feature-length animation seen in "Snow White
and the Seven Dwarfs®," released in 1937 and his first film to use
the multi-plane camera. Walt Disney was inducted into the National Inventor's
Hall of Fame in 2000.
Patent for Ironing Board issued April
26, 1892
African American woman invents predecessor
to modern ironing board
Sarah Boone, of New Haven, CT, received patent
#473,653 for the ironing board on April 26, 1892. Boone's ironing board
was made of a narrow wooden board, with collapsible legs and a padded cover
and was specifically designed for the fitted clothing worn during that
time period, particularly the sleeves and bodices of ladies' garments.
Prior to her inventions, people resorted to simply using a table or being
creative in laying a plank of wood across two chairs or small tables.
Patent for Safety Pin Issued
April 10, 1849 A New Yorker invents a handy device.
Walter Hunt, of New York, NY, received patent #6,281 for
the safety pin on April 10, 1849. Hunt's pin was made from one piece of
wire, which was coiled into a spring at one end and a separate clasp and
point at the other end, allowing the point of the wire to be forced
by the spring into the clasp. Walter Hunt was extremely creative, and in
1834 he built America's first sewing machine, which also used the
first eye-pointed needle. He abandoned his efforts because he thought
it would put hand sewers out of work. Nearly 20 years later, Elias Howe
reinvented and patented an eye-pointed needle sewing machine.
INVENTION'S WANTED REGARDING
HOMELAND SECURITY
(Source: Mass High Tech
April 1-7, 2002 page 13)
Contact: Tracy
Cronin, Program Manager at Technical support Working Group (TSWG),
a government agency that works closely with the departments of State, Defense,
Energy and Justice. To learn exactly how to submit an invention to
the government Visit web site: TSWG
Others include the US Army Soldier Center in Natick,
MA NATICK LABS
And, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
which provide conduits that companies can use to tap into federal funds
DARPA
NEED MONEY FOR YOUR ENERGY
RELATED INVENTION??
U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY SOLICITING PROPOSALS
FOR ENERGY INVENTIONS
The US Dept. of Energy's "Inventions and Innovation
Program" provides financial assistance for establishing technical
performance and conducting early development of innovative ideas and inventions
that can lead to significant energy savings impact. Financial assistance
is given at two levels - Category 1 for up to $40,000 for conceptual ideas
and Category 2 for up to $200,000 for the minimum requirement of a completed
engineering analysis and/or a bench scale model. The grants are restricted
to US applicants with special consideration given to individual inventors
and small businesses. For more information, visit DOE Web site:
http://www.eere.energy.gov/inventions/energytechnet.
Useful Links and Information
For Inventors and Entrepreneurs
Provided by The U.S. Dept. of Energy
USEFUL
LINKS FROM D.O.E.
________________________________________________________________________________
HOME
MEETING INFO
PATENT INFO.
FRIENDLY LINKS
CONTACT IANE
Disclaimer: This web site is provided for information
purposes and is not legal advice. Anyone seeking legal advice should
contact a lawyer, patent agent or patent attorney. Jurisdiction
is in Massachusetts, USA.
Copyright 2002-2008 Inventors'
Association of New England P.O. Box 335 Lexington, MA 02420-0004